Hertzinno Technical Blog

We're sharing knowledge in the areas which fascinate us the most
click

Why Single-Gas Hydrogen Monitoring Is Not Enough: The Hidden Challenge of Steel-Origin Hydrogen in Transformers

By Chuanqi.Wang March 31st, 2026 80 views

Introduction

Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA) is a critical tool for assessing the internal condition of power transformers. Hydrogen (H₂) is one of the most common characteristic gases, but its sources are diverse – ranging from normal material chemical reactions to incipient faults such as partial discharge and overheating. Accurately identifying the source of hydrogen is essential for transformer condition assessment and maintenance decision‑making.

This article systematically reviews the main sources, generation mechanisms, and identification methods for hydrogen in transformer oil, and highlights the drawbacks of relying solely on single‑gas hydrogen monitoring.


1. Main Sources of Hydrogen

Based on gas generation mechanisms and associated characteristics, hydrogen sources fall into three categories: internal faults, material chemical reactions, and external factors.

1.1 Internal Faults

(1) Partial Discharge (Most Typical Hydrogen Source)

  • Mechanism: Weak discharge causes oil molecule cracking → H₂ generation.

  • Gas signature: H₂ dominates (>80%), trace CH₄ and C₂H₆ possible, almost no C₂H₂.

  • Key indicator: Isolated H₂ rise with very low other hydrocarbons.

(2) High‑Temperature Overheating

  • Mechanism: Thermal breaking of C‑H bonds releases H₂.

  • Gas signature: CH₄, C₂H₆, C₂H₄ appear depending on temperature; H₂ level usually lower than in discharge cases.

  • Key indicator: H₂ rise accompanied by significant hydrocarbon gases (especially C₂H₄).

1.2 Material Chemical Reactions (Common “Benign” Hydrogen)

Type Mechanism Typical Scenario Gas Signature
Moisture‑involved reaction Fe + H₂O → FeO + 2H → H₂ High humidity, poor sealing H₂↑ + moisture↑
Cyclohexane catalytic dehydrogenation Cyclohexane → Benzene + H₂ (Ni catalyst) Stainless steel bellows expanders Isolated H₂↑ (up to thousands ppm)
Metal corrosion Electrochemical rusting produces H₂ Rust in tank, core, coolers Isolated H₂↑, possible moisture↑

1.3 External Factors

  • Residual hydrogen in new oil: Dissolved during refining, transport, or filling – common in newly commissioned transformers, decreases with operation.

  • Improper oil treatment: Insufficient vacuum, short processing time, or poor temperature control can increase dissolved gases including H₂.


2. Identification Methods for Hydrogen Sources

Core principle: Never rely on hydrogen concentration alone – combine multi‑dimensional information.

Method 1: Characteristic Gas Combinations (Most Direct)

H₂ Trend Accompanying Gases Moisture Most Likely Source Action
Isolated rise No hydrocarbons, CO normal Normal Cyclohexane dehydrogenation, residual H₂ Monitor only
Isolated rise No hydrocarbons, CO normal Elevated Moisture‑related corrosion Check sealing, treat moisture
Rise CH₄, C₂H₄ etc. Normal or elevated Overheating Electrical tests, plan inspection
Rise (dominant) Trace CH₄, C₂H₆, no C₂H₂ Normal Partial discharge PD measurement, consider outage
Rise C₂H₂ present Normal Arcing (severe) Immediate outage

Method 2: Monitor Moisture Content

  • H₂↑ + moisture↑ → Moisture reaction or corrosion

  • H₂↑ + moisture normal → Discharge, catalytic dehydrogenation, or residual H₂

Method 3: Track Gas Trends

  • Rapid continuous increase → Active fault, need outage

  • Peak then stable/declining → Commissioning “break‑in” or catalytic equilibrium

  • Seasonal fluctuation → Moisture‑related reactions

Method 4: Combine Electrical Tests & Operating History

  • High PD, ultrasonic anomalies → Partial discharge

  • Unbalanced DC resistance, abnormal core ground current, IR hot spots → Overheating

  • All tests normal + short service life → Material/process factors

Method 5: Use Carbon Monoxide (CO) – Key to Avoiding False Alarms

Principle: CO is a specific byproduct of solid insulation (cellulose) thermal decomposition. Material/chemical hydrogen sources do not involve insulation heating, so CO remains normal.

Decision logic:

  • H₂↑ + CO normal → Benign hydrogen (material/process) – no unnecessary outage.

  • H₂↑ + CO↑ → Overheating involving solid insulation (e.g., multiple core grounds) – be alert.

  • CO↑ + H₂ normal → Normal thermal aging – not an emergency.

Practical value: Using H₂ and CO as a paired indicator significantly reduces false alarms and avoids costly unnecessary inspections.


3. Case Studies

Case 1: Stainless Steel Expander Dehydrogenation (Benign)

  • Situation: 220kV transformer, 3 months in service, H₂ = 1500 μL/L, other gases <1 μL/L, moisture normal, all electrical tests normal.

  • Diagnosis: Cyclohexane catalytic dehydrogenation.

  • Outcome: After 1 year, H₂ stabilized at ~800 μL/L – no action needed.

Case 2: Moisture Corrosion + Low‑Temperature Overheating

  • Situation: 110kV transformer, 10 years in service, H₂ = 380 μL/L, CH₄ = 45 μL/L, C₂H₄ = 28 μL/L, moisture rose from 12 to 25 mg/L.

  • Diagnosis: Moisture‑induced rust reaction with mild overheating.

  • Outcome: Internal inspection revealed core rusting; after treatment, H₂ returned to normal.


4. Conclusion: The Pitfalls of Single‑Gas Hydrogen Monitoring

Relying solely on hydrogen monitoring carries significant false‑alarm risks because:

  • Hydrogen sources are diverse – benign (material/process) and fault‑related (discharge/overheating) are indistinguishable from H₂ alone.

  • Single‑gas data cannot identify fault type, severity, or location.

  • It can lead to two extremes: missing major faults (assuming benign) or frequent false alarms → unnecessary outages and wasted resources.

Recommendations:

  1. Prefer multi‑component DGA (at least H₂ + CH₄ + C₂H₂ + CO + moisture).

  2. Allow elevated H₂ in newly commissioned transformers, but track trends and check CO.

  3. For isolated H₂ rise with normal CO – do not rush to outage; enhance monitoring or perform degassing.


FAQ

Q: What is the typical alarm threshold for hydrogen in transformer oil?
A: Usually >150 μL/L warrants attention, but thresholds vary by voltage class and asset type – trend analysis is more important.

Q: How long does it take for hydrogen to drop in a new transformer?
A: Typically 1‑3 months of operation or hot oil circulation. If H₂ remains high with hydrocarbon gases, further investigation is needed.

Q: Are single‑gas hydrogen monitors still useful?
A: They can provide basic early warning for distribution‑class transformers, but for critical assets, upgrade to multi‑component DGA is strongly recommended.


HERTZINNO’s online DGA systems (DGA900, DGA500, DGA300) support multi‑component gas plus moisture monitoring, effectively avoiding false alarms caused by single‑gas hydrogen monitoring. Learn more →

Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA) for Transformers: A Technical Deep Dive – From Gas Chromatography to Photoacoustic Spectroscopy(PAS),Hertzinno
Previous
Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA) for Transformers: A Technical Deep Dive – From Gas Chromatography to Photoacoustic Spectroscopy(PAS)
Read More
Next
变压器油中溶解氢气的来源分析与判别:为什么单氢气监测容易误报?
Read More
Leave a message
Your Name*
Company Name*
Email*
Message*
Country*
Code*
Verification Code
We use Cookie to improve your online experience. By continuing browsing this website, we assume you agree our use of Cookie.